Don’t be a dipstick

If I want to know how much oil is in my car’s engine, I check the dipstick.

The dipstick provides a gauge of the amount of oil in my engine. If the dipstick registers “full” because there an oil mark at one inch, I understand that there’s more than one inch of oil in my engine. The dipstick provides an indirect gauge of the amount of oil in my engine.

That’s what cholesterol was meant to provide: A gauge, a “dipstick,” for the kind of lipoproteins (lipid-carrying proteins) in the bloodstream.

Lipoproteins are a collection of particles that are larger than a single cholesterol molecule but much smaller than a red blood cell. Lipoproteins consist of many components: various proteins, phospholipids, lots of triglycerides, as well as cholesterol. In the 1960s, methods to characterize lipoproteins were not widely available, so the cholesterol in lipoproteins were used as a “dipstick” to assess low-density lipoproteins (“LDL cholesterol”) and high-density lipoproteins (“HDL cholesterol”). (Actually, even “LDL cholesterol” was not measured, but was derived from “total cholesterol,” the quantity of cholesterol in all lipoprotein fractions.)

Some other component of lipoproteins could have been measured instead of cholesterol, such as apoprotein B, apoprotein C, or others, all meant to act as the “dipstick” for various lipoproteins.

Relying on cholesterol to characterize lipoproteins provides a misleading picture. Imagine watching cars go by at high speed while standing on the side of the highway. You want to count how many people–not cars, but people–go by in a given amount of time. Because you cannot make out the detail of each and every car whizzing by, you count the number of cars and assume that each car carries two people. Whether it’s rush hour, Sunday morning, late evening, rainy, sunny, or snowing, you make the same assumption: two people per car.

That’s what cholesterol does: It is assuming that each and every lipoprotein particle (car) carries the same amount of cholesterol (people).

But that may, obviously, not be true. A bus goes by carrying 25 people. Plenty of cars may carry just the driver. People carpooling may be in cars carrying 3 or 4 people. Assuming just 2 people per car can send your estimates way off course.

That is precisely what happens when your doctor tries to use conventional cholesterol values (total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol) to gauge the lipoproteins in your bloodstream. Measuring cholesterol can also provide the false impression that cholesterol is the cause of heart disease, even though it was originally meant to simply serve as a “dipstick.”

What we need to do is to characterize lipoproteins themselves. We can distinguish them by size, number, density, charge, and the type and form of proteins contained within. It provides greater insight into the composition of lipoproteins in the blood. It provides greater insight into the causes underlying coronary atherosclerotic plaque. It can also tell us what dietary changes trigger different particle patterns and how to correct them.

Until you have a full lipoprotein analysis, you can never know for certain 1) if you will have heart disease in your future, or 2) how your heart disease was caused.

Unfortunately, the vast majority of doctors are perfectly content to just count cars going by and assume two people per car, i.e., confine assessment of your heart disease risk using cholesterol . . . just as drug industry marketing has instructed them.

It’s not your job to educate your doctor. If he or she refuses to provide access to lipoprotein testing to better determine your heart disease risk, then consider going out on your own. Many of our Track Your Plaque program followers have obtained lipoprotein testing on their own through Direct Labs.



Change your life in 60 seconds


This entry was posted in Cholesterol, Lipoprotein testing. Bookmark the permalink.

32 Responses to Don’t be a dipstick

  1. Anonymous says:

    Nice analogy.

    Any idea where we can go for equivalent tests in the UK?

    Nina

  2. Kurt says:

    Thanks for the 10% off at Swanson's (your ad)!

    I took the VAP test and my results were excellent. It was very reassuring.

  3. Jonathan says:

    That dipstick showing a lot or a little oil also doesn't tell you about the sand that chewed up your cylinders.

  4. Kathryn says:

    I've used Direct Labs & others to order my own tests directly. It works very well.

    Currently i'm working with a doc who seems willing to work with me. However the cholesterol panel he ordered recently did not include the part that actually measures LDL (as opposed to "calculate" it). He is not opposed to running that test, but tells me he doesn't know if Medicare (my insurance) will cover it.

    What is the name of the test i would need to run that actually measures LDL?

  5. skepticaldoc says:

    Great analogy!!!

  6. Anonymous says:

    Very nice post, but interesting irony. The doctor implies it is drug companies responsible for the lack of useful testing, and then someone from the UK wants to know where he/she can go for equivalent tests. Surely not to your primary care physician! Many Canadians will also want to know because govts are much tighter than insurance companies, since the latter must compete for business. Lesson: govt health care monopolies spend less because they do less (e.g., testing) and do it slower.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Long time reader, just wanted to post some info that comes within the industry:
    "The nmr is not an accurate test. I cannot tell you how many physicians have lost confidence in the results due to the high variance in particle number. One physician ordered 2 nmrs on the same patient by accident and the difference in LDL-p was over 800. Pathetic. Stick to apoB." Sorry that this complicates things.

  8. CarbSane says:

    Unfortunately, some states (I think at this point only NY & Cali) do not allow patient initiated tests outside the "system".

    With Obamacare, I fear more states will follow this, as gawd forbid anyone tries to get a handle on their own health markers, at their own expense and/or try to do anything (like changes in diet) to improve them.

  9. Anonymous says:

    "With Obamacare, I fear more states will follow this, as gawd forbid anyone tries to get a handle on their own health markers, at their own expense and/or try to do anything (like changes in diet) to improve them."

    Please tell me what, specifically, in "Obamacare" would prohibit the sort of tests you're interested in? I'm pretty sure you can't provide an answer. Your claim (and fears) is not grounded in fact, but rests on the ideologically motivated obfuscations of others who have a vested interest in resisting meaningful healthcare reform. I'm sure we all had it much better the day before "Obamacare" went into effect.

  10. Anonymous says:

    Please post the components of the complete lipoprotein panel that you suggest. Thank you

  11. CarbSane says:

    Obamacare is all about government controlling the type of medical care we receive. It is dictating the type of insurance we are required to carry, and it is all about getting our information into the "system".

    If I'm willing to pay for any diagnostic test, why can't I do this without a note from my doctor? You can't in NY and California. I see this spreading to other states rather than being repealed. Too much freedom.

  12. Anonymous says:

    I too would like to avail of an NMR cholesterol test in Europe, so would appreciate any information on where it is available.

    I also read a review recently (but can't find it now) of the NMR and VAP tests, dated 2009. The author concluded that there was little consistency between them and suggested that perhaps the technologies were not yet mature. Any thoughts on that?

  13. Anonymous says:

    I think this kind of test is only available in USA

  14. Prostatic Adenocarcinoma says:

    I am quite interesting in this topic hope you will elaborate more on it in future posts.

  15. Anonymous says:

    Hi Dr. Davis,

    Would be useful to get your thoughts if there is any truth to the claims that NMR and VAP are too imprecise to be reliable…

    Thanks,
    David

  16. health says:

    If you're looking to buy best protein powder (or related protein products) but not sure what to look for, this free expert-nutrition tutorial can help.

  17. grandpa says:

    I went to direct labs but not sure which ones are the ones to order. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.

  18. TedHutchinson says:

    In case anyone didn't check. The link provided by Dr Davis to Direct Labs also includes a special offer on 25(OH)D tests.

    Vitamin D, 25-Hydroxy-October Test of the Month $39

  19. Anonymous says:

    Which test do we order at Direct Labs?

    THANKS

  20. TedHutchinson says:

    Presumably you are referring to Dr Davis's post and not my reminder about the special offer on
    Vitamin D, 25-Hydroxy-October Test of the Month $39

    The test that actually measures the different cholesterol particle sizes is the
    NMR LIPO Profile Retail $167 Direct Labs $99

    Jimmy Moore had a NMR lipid profile and he explains his and Christine's results in this blogpost LipoScience's NMR LipoProfile Test: A Revolutionary, More Accurate Lipid Profile Particle Size Screening

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>